header image
 

Meme 3

Mariana at Gatochy’s Blog tagged me for this meme. The requirements are as follows:

1. Pick up the nearest book.
2. Open to page 123.
3. Locate the fifth sentence.
4. Post the next three sentences on your blog and in so doing…
5. Tag five people, and acknowledge who tagged you.

A monastic-puritanical, world-negating ethical system then radically and immediately transfigures all the images of myth. No longer can the hero rest in innocence with the goddess of the flesh: for she is become the queen of sin. “

So long as a man has any regard for this corpse-like body,” writes the Hindu monk Shankaracharya, “he is impure, and suffers from his enemies as well as from birth, disease, and death: but when he thinks of himself as pure, as the essence of Good, and the Immovable, he becomes free… “

from The Hero With A Thousand Faces  by Joseph Campbell

I’ll let others decide the appropriateness and correspondences.

I don’t always follow through on memes by tagging others. If anyone is interested however, I am tagging the following five people.

Becky @ According to Bex

Michelle @ Crow’s Feet

Lynn Jones @ YATB

Luis Drayton @ Luis Droppings

Stephanie @ Stephanie”s Pillowbook

I  won’t take it personally if you do not choose to participate.

Petition

In case you missed this on other sites, this is a Petition to the APA. opposing the announced inclusion Of Dr. Kenneth Zucker and Dr. Ray Blanchard to the Task Force: Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders assigned for updating the GID guidelines of DSM-V. Apparently, another associate of the above, Dr. Ann Lawrence is under consideration as a possible alternate member of the task force.

Anyone unclear on Zucker’s approach to gender variance tratment can listen to (or read) NPR’s two part program in which Zucker participated:

Part 1

Part 2

There are currently 1,900+global signatures (including mine). There is an option to exclude your named being displayed on the petition site if you are concerned about your privacy.

A Middle Way

 I’m finding myself filled lately with a host of meandering but interconnected or overlapping feelings and thoughts. It struck me as quite humorous ( and for no particular reason) this evening that my blog roll expands another link or two, each time I sign in. The order is simply alphabetic; certainly some form of categorization would better organize it. But to do that, wouldn’t it (and I) have to have a more definitive purpose?

Blogging, as a journal, represents an effort to attempt a reasonably honest self-reflection, in both the significant and the mundane. If, as a journal, it is really to reflect back an occasional, useful insight, then I don’t necessarily get to choose the insights it reflects, especially for myself. Rather I have to uncover them, if they exist at all.

The choice still always exists for directing what I write about. Putting up the previous post left me thinking quite a bit about why I felt such urgency of emotional connection to an event that will never more than marginally affect me.  I’m as comfortable now as I am likely to expect to be, with my own gender identification and the options I have already for its expression.

My present age, the particulars of my personal health, and the crossing legal complexities of dual continent residency/citizenship present limitations that might even prove beneficial in limiting any personal impact of the APA announcement even further. I’ve noted  (I think) elsewhere, that I accept the limitation of possibilities as a kind of creative path in themselves. But, at least in terms of this emotional connection, the desire to be anarchistic, as an expression of creativity plays no part in my emotional response.

I do not especially want to be an activist at this stage in my life. Having grown up actively as a hippie, I expected the assumed inexhaustible energy of inspired youth to be the only necessity for achieving change. I learned to the contrary, through a number of experiences. With present hindsight, I see that energy as often misguided, misdirected, and misused. Sometimes even deliberately manipulated and abused, even by myself, as an accessory to the agendas of others.

 I have little of the excited passion, hopeful anticipation, or sustained rebellious anger that I had 35+ years ago. Too much energy in activism, then and now, can be simply eaten up by malicious, vindictive infighting serving individual ego and persona that have no connection to commonality of stated purpose. The obsession for endlessly debating the semantics of defining labels of identity in trans politics certainly has zero politically viable potential.

There is however, an air of utter contemptuousness, both intellectual and ethical, that offends both intelligence and conscience in the APA announced appointment of two outrageously self-promoting, extremely biased individuals with controversial and questionable scientific credentials to a work group that is responsible for developing professional guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gender conditions. Conditions for which, they personally advocate, suppression as an actual preferred method of treatment. Neither accepts gender variance itself as manifestations of distinct psychological or medical disorders.  Instead they are categorized as either an unacknowledged homosexual pathology or compulsive and self-obsessive sexual addiction.

My activist impulses now are generally confined to and satisfied by, the unending task of sorting out and changing of my personal contributions to existing social and environmental problems. The political viability is limited, but to a more accessible certainty, of one me less, one me more. My ability to be proactive is not conditional to the necessity of a specific validating label. There can be strength in numbers, if the numbers actually signify a meaningful collective. Harmony perhaps, not cacophony or echoes.

My emotional engagement through offense to my intellect or conscience is selfish and egotistical. Perhaps its just guilt that makes me feel I don’t want my own experience to be solely for my own gratification. I do know I haven’t arrived at this point of feeling “comfortable” with my gender on my own. I found this comfort also because of the efforts of many known and unknown others: Surprised by it from anticipated enemies, assured of it from long accepting friends. My present comfort is a benefit collectively bestowed, a privileged I have been enabled to enjoy.

 

It should really be everyone’s inherent right instead.

Maybe that’s a good enough reason to want to kick someones ass.

 

Things Can Get Worse

I apologize for creating a post out of links and re-directs, but the subject is too important to rely simply on what I might personally know. The American Psychiatric Association has named its work group members appointed to revise the Manual for Diagnosis of Mental Disorders in preparation for the DSM-V. The outcome of this revision will effect ALL trans gender medical treatment, and has significant  implications that touch the entire LGBT community. The announced group is seriously biased by several very actively trans hostile appointees.

1) Via Lynn Conway ’s Trans News Update

2) Via Mercedes Allen : Dented Blue Mercedes & cross posted to The Belerico Project & Questioning Transphobia

3) Via Rebecca at Burning Words

Lynn’s site lists links to important background material, and Mercedes has some contact info for the APA.

The group has been named, apparently without imput from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH, formerly HBIGDA) which maintains the the current Standards of Care derived from Dr Benjamin’s original model. Changes in the DSM-V will have very direct impact on that model.

Dr. Kenneth Zucker, the group Chair gained notoriety for his use of reversion therapy to “cure” gender variant children (by forcing them to conform to normative models, directed toward a normative heterosexual outcome). His work is publicly supported by right wing and religious groups, like The Catholic Education Center. 

Dr Ray Blanchard is also named to the group. Blanchard does not recognize trans men. According to Dr. Blanchard’s theories trans women fall into one of two categories: 1) homosexuals in a stage of denial or 2) autogynephiles (his term): A compulsive addiction of males sexually obsessed with the eroticism of themselves as female.

Anyone, currently in or considering transition, should seriously consider that the presence of such thinking on the work group responsible for setting the conditions under which treatment of any kind is legitimately provided presents serious dangers not only to the success of their own transition, but to the possible elimination of transition itself as an option.

Associations

Image association is a quality inherent in all forms of visual art. It is through association that we come to connect to an image. And the depth of association is the entire basis for defining the depth of connection as meaning.  Entire art movements have had a direct foundational basis in exploring the nature of association itself. Dada, and  Pop Art being obvious examples which explore and exploit association as subject in a deliberate manner , irrespective of differences in their theoretical or technical approaches. My own visual output, personal and commercial, relies entirely on association; Success or failure depends on my ability to achieve the intention of a specific motivating association.

 

Self Portrait   Copyright Emma G, 2008 

It is hard for me to single out an aspect of my own identity as well, that is completely devoid of associations. My trans gender identification relies significantly on associations, especially visually ones. These visual associations depend not only on my own perception of the associations, but also on the degree of adherence or variance they encounter in relation to culturally perceived associations. They are often taken from diverse and sometimes conflicting sources. Part of the process of discovery (or recovery) that most trans identified seem to go through. 

Marianna in Lisbon, Portugal does a regular ongoing series of postings on her blog exploring her own personal image associations that I enjoy a great deal. I thought it might be fun to offer my own variation on her theme.

 

Pinup, circa 1930s    Copyright,  Alberto Vargas (1896-1982)

 

 

Pinup: Self Portrait after Vargas   Copyright Emma G, 2008

Any associations, beyond an attempt to capture the stylistic and aesthetic concerns  that might have made Vargas’ work uniquely his own, I leave open: As being at best potentially marginal if unconsciously present. and not as any conscious intention of my own.